So what’s good for the goose is apparently not always good for the gander. There is a story in today’s Las Vegas Sun that refers to a Vegas version of the now famous Anti-Gay Blacklist over donors to the Prop 8 issue in California. The part of the article that jumped out to me was this little section:
“I think it’s too bad, isn’t it? They’re accusing us of a hate crime and they are being hateful. I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman,” she said. “I am a very loving, kind person.”
Her counter argument neatly sums up the response a number of people on the list had: Blacklisting someone for being intolerant is intolerant in and of itself. Take Richard Ziser, chairman of Nevada Concerned Citizens, an advocacy group very vocal in its stance against gay marriage.
“This shows how intolerant the gay community is when they don’t get their way,” Ziser said
So couple this with some of the information that I’ve found in the conversations with folks at Beetle Blogger over a boycott/letter writing campaign of Campbell’s Soup proposed by the American Family Association for advertising in The Advocate makes it very, VERY clear to me that a good number of these people are hypocrites – yes, yes, I know that shouldn’t be a shocker at this point but lets take a look at some of the boycotts against companies because of their support for the LGBT community shall we?
- 1996 American Family Association launched a boycott against Walt Disney Company when the company began giving benefits to same-sex employees in domestic partnerships because Michael Eisner “was involved in a media group that actively promoted the homosexual agenda” and was pushing the “gay agenda”
- 2004 American Family Association and Focus on the Family propose boycott of Proctor & Gamble because ‘Proctor & Gamble…has publicly thrown their support and money behind the homosexual political agenda’ and the group also claimed the company was showing its ‘support for homosexual marriage’
- 2005 AFA boycotted the company American Girl, seller of dolls and accessories, because the company supported the charity Girls, Inc. which the AFA called a “pro-abortion, pro-lesbian advocacy group”
- 2005 AFA launched boycott of Ford for advertising in gay magazines, donating to gay-rights organizations, and sponsoring gay pride celebrations.
- 2005 Focus on the Family boycotts Wells Fargo because of the banks ‘ongoing efforts to advance the radical homosexual agenda’ because of a contribution Wells Fargo made to GLAAD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation).
- 2006 AFA calls for protest/boycott of Kraft Foods for their support of the 2006 Gay Games in Chicago, IL.
- 2006 AFA urged members to condemn Sears for running commercials on LOGO an LGBT cable channel.
- 2007 Walmart decided to curb its support of LGBT organizations after conservative Christian groups threatened a boycott
- 2007 AFA spoke out against IKEA for featuring homosexual families in their television ads.
- 2008 American Family Association ended the half-year boycott against McDonald’s after the company agreed to ‘remain neutral in the culture war regarding homosexual marriage. In May the AFA launched a website against McDonald’s for its support of the LGBT community – this because of their involvement in the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce.
- 2008 AFA announced their boycott of Hallmark Cards for their decision to start selling same-sex wedding cards.
- 2008 AFA protested Heinz television advertisement (shown ONLY in the United Kingdom), which showed two men kissing.
- 2008 AFA wants members to protest Campbell’s Soup for advertising in The Advocate magazine – which they consider “helping homosexual activists push their agenda. Not only did the ads cost Campbell’s a chunk of money, but they also sent a message that homosexual parents constitute a family and are worthy of support. They also gave their approval to the entire homosexual agend.”
- 2008 AFA wants members to protest PepsiCo for their $500,000 donation to PFLAG (Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) for again, as they call it “pushing the homosexual agenda in the workplace.”
So, let me get this straight, it is perfectly okay for them to boycott companies, organizations, etc. for their support of LGBT causes, events, or organizations but, when the shoe is on the other foot we are being “hateful” and “intolerant” – is that the general gist of it? Well boo-frickin’-hoo I strongly suggest they build a bridge…and get over it. I keep getting the impression that we (gays and lesbians) are just supposed to ‘sit down, shut up, and take what we get’ – Yes suh, massa Eyes sho glad you ’round to tell me what mah rights are. No suh, massa I’s not back talkin’ ya. I mean these people probably think Rosa Parks was hateful and intolerant to that white man for refusing to give up her seat to him simply because that was the way things were. Doesn’t mean they were right and doesn’t mean they did not need to change.
I think to counter the negative effects of some of these boycotts or protests that the LGBT community needs to come out equally, if not more-so, as strong in support of those companies that support us and stand up to the bullies and the conservative Christians (yes, that in itself is laughable) who would seek to keep us in the ‘back of the bus’. Write those letters, make those calls, and buy those products to support them. Let’s face it, if the LGBT community makes up about 10% of the population and AFA – just based on the circulation of their monthly newsletter – only has 180,000 – heck, lets assume that half of them do not subscribe to the journal and say 360,000 – then you tell me – Who has more clout and buying power?
I would absolutely LOVE to see a Blacklist for every state or major city to tell you the truth – I prefer bigots to be bigots to my face but, they lack the courage of their convictions in most cases – similar to the KKK and their hoods….you know…too ashamed to show their faces in public. Anyway a local blacklist would allow me to put my money where my mouth is – just like these groups do only they don’t see it as “hateful” or “intolerant” at all. They wrap themselves in the blanket of ‘we’re doing it for the children’ – which sounds remarkably like the slogan that has-been Anita Bryant and her Florida campaign from the 70′s.
Don’t get me wrong – I totally believe these people are entitled to their own opinions and thoughts (no matter how misguided they are) otherwise I would be just as guilty of trying to exclude people as they are. What I do not believe is they have the right to push THEIR beliefs on others or promote hatred any more than some white supremacist or anti-Semitic group does – which is EXACTLY how I equate them.
Recent Comments