Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Marriage’

Wow. Desperate Much?

April 8, 2009 1 comment

This morning, the “National Organization for Marriage” launched a disturbing ad using actors to push lies claiming that marriage equalty threatens personal freedoms. The ad is going up on the airwaves across America — eight times a day in California — as NOM seeks to build what they are calling a “rainbow coalition” against equality.

What is REALLY laughable is that they say the people in the ad are not actors but, here are the audition reels – wow some people will do anything for money I guess.  What a bunch of asshats.

Audition Tape 1:

Audition Tape 2:

I guess with the passage of legislation in Vermont and the new same sex ruling in Iowa coupled with MA and CT and the potential for CA to go to same-sex marriage these wackos are getting desperate.

NY judge: Same-sex spouse gets husband’s estate

February 4, 2009 Leave a comment

From the Associated Press:

A judge has issued New York state’s first ruling that the survivor of a legal same-sex marriage is entitled to inherit a dead spouse’s estate.

Manhattan Surrogate Court Judge Kristin Booth Glen ruled that J. Craig Leiby was “the surviving spouse” and sole heir of H. Kenneth Ranftle.

For the full story clicky linky

I had heard that New York was going to recognize foreign same sex marriages – I don’t understand how/why they would do that but would not allow same sex marriages in their state.  Oh well….the times they are a’ changin’ and changing for the better (but then, I guess THAT depends on who you ask – LOL) 

Oh no, I like gay people I have a few friends are gay and my mom LOVES to watch ‘Queer Eye for the Straight Guy’!  I’ll never forget that one as long as I live….

Dude, Where’s My Hood?

February 1, 2009 Leave a comment

Dunno her position on Prop 8, just happened to find this and thought it was funny.

Like some tired old Klansman of days gone by, Prop 8 supporters were trying to hide their faces behind the white sheets/hoods of anonymity.  But a Federal judge has denied Prop 8 supporters request to withhold disclosure of the names and address of Prop 8 supporters (you know the ones who wanted to ban same-sex marriage in CA) – as noted in the LA Times.  If they are so proud of their cause/support, why would they be ashamed of their support of said support being made public.  

I, personally, prefer to know who the bigots are – yes, I understand that people are entitled to their opinions but, IMHO voting to TAKE AWAY rights of others makes you a bigot….YES so, I really like this handy database I found that lets me see who donated what and who they work for.  Wow, imagine my surprise when I found people in Virginia that work for huge companies that have impressive diversity policies that donated to take away rights of their fellow citizens.  Even a few people in Richmond donated to Yes on 8 – luckily, the majority of the donors (local) donated to fight against the proposition.

Regarding DOMA

January 8, 2009 1 comment

From his LA Times article – Bob Barr, the author of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, admits that he was wrong and now thinks it’s time for his law to get the boot and, frankly, I couldn’t agree more.  Even President Elect Obama believes that DOMA needs to be stricken down.  YAY Obama! 

In effect, DOMA’s language reflects one-way federalism: It protects only those states that don’t want to accept a same-sex marriage granted by another state. Moreover, the heterosexual definition of marriage for purposes of federal laws — including, immigration, Social Security survivor rights and veteran’s benefits — has become a de facto club used to limit, if not thwart, the ability of a state to choose to recognize same-sex unions.

I guess this really isn’t NEW news, since he stated the same thing in May of last year at the 2008 Libertarian National Convention (see below) but I still think it’s a ‘Good Thing’ – yes, yes….I love Martha – Deal With It.

Join the Impact Against DOMA

January 4, 2009 1 comment

Join the Impact is seeking to gather at least one million signatures on an Open Letter to President Barack Obama to be delivered to him on his first day in office, in protest of DOMA.

Find out more at Join the Impact!  The event itself will vary by location depending on organizers availability and local sense of how to best do it.  Here’s a link to information for cities in Virginia.

You’re just like us

January 1, 2009 1 comment

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard that comment and I guess my only reaction really is sort of a ‘Yeah – what did you think?’  I don’t go around with a tiara on my head or anything and I certainly don’t introduce myself, “Hi, I’m Chuck – and I’m gay!  Nice to meet you.” but, conversely there is no shame in my game – if someone has the balls to ask me if I’m gay then, I certainly have the balls to answer them honestly.  I’ve gotten the ‘..but you’re so normal’ comment a bit more than I would really like – after all, what is it people are expecting?  I really think the uninformed masses are expecting us (gays and lesbians) to be something akin to what they see in the media.  

Every time I see coverage of an LGBT event or something like a Pride event, inevitably, the media focuses on THE most extreme attendants.  How many times I have seen leather daddies, drag queens, guys in jockstraps and combat boots, dykes on bikes, etc. versus the number of oh say….Log Cabin Republicans or gay/lesbian families with children?  (Side note – I should say that, IMHO, there is nothing wrong with being into leather, drag, etc. if that is your bag – after all, there are also a fair number of heterosexuals in the leather/fetish/cross dressing community.  I think the media focuses too much on those ‘fringe’ groups for ratings and sensationalism instead of showing non-stereotypical gays and lesbians.)

Once people get to know me and are more comfortable around me, the topic of my personal life comes up they are usually very surprised all in all.  I also get comments like, ‘You’re the first gay person I’ve known’ or ‘You’re the first gay person I’ve been comfortable enough with to ask this but…’ – I usually tell them that I am happy to answer their questions.  I would rather people ask me and give me the opportunity to let them be informed versus going around assuming things about me and other LGBT folks (not that I speak for all of us but…).  In the end, most of the folks I talk to come to the realization that, ‘Wow, you’re just like me/us’ and that’s really all I want people to know.

I mean I AM just like you with the exception of something that I actually find about as significant to the whole as the color of my eyes.  I am Chuck; I’m a friend; I’m a son; I’m a brother; I’m a co-worker; I’m a father; I’m a grandfather; I’m a fellow human and…I just ‘happen’ to be gay.  I am so much more than my sexuality, I’m just sorry that there are those out there that seem to focus on that small part of me first and foremost among all of my other qualities and contributions.

We worry about the same things you do – will my son make the right decisions? will the three houses around me sell soon so my property value can recover? will my job still be there 6 months from now?  which bill do I put off paying this month so I can afford to buy my niece a birthday present? should I start saving now for the new windshield I’m going to need for my car to pass inspection? what kind of anniversary present should I get my son and daughter-in-law? which store has the best price on fridge pack sodas this week? etc.

Do I want to destroy marriage?  Do I want to undermine YOUR traditions?  Do I want to flaunt my sexuality?  No, as a matter of fact I.DO.NOT. but, what I do want is to have exactly the same rights and benefits that many heterosexual couples wake up with and take for granted on a daily basis.  If my neighbors husband dies, she is able to receive his pension or social security benefits; if my neighbors wife is in the hospital, he automatically has the right to be there and say what happens if she is unable to do so; if my neighbors husband is placed into a nursing home, she is not forced to sell her home to pay for his care; if my neighbors wife is wrongfully killed in an automobile accident, he has the right to sue for wrongful death or loss of consortium.  There are many more examples of federal and state benefits that heterosexual couples automatically receive just by getting married.

On the order of 1,400 legal rights are conferred upon married couples in the U.S. Typically these are composed of about 400 state benefits and over 1,000 federal benefits. Among them are the rights to:

  • joint parenting;
  • joint adoption;
  • joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents);
  • status as next-of-kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent;
  • joint insurance policies for home, auto and health;
  • dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support;
  • immigration and residency for partners from other countries;
  • inheritance automatically in the absence of a will;
  • joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment;
  • inheritance of jointly-owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate);
  • benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare;
  • spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home;
  • veterans’ discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns;
  • joint filing of customs claims when traveling;
  • wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children;
  • bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child;
  • decision-making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her;
  • crime victims’ recovery benefits;
  • loss of consortium tort benefits;
  • domestic violence protection orders;
  • judicial protections and evidentiary immunity;
  • and more….

Most of these legal and economic benefits cannot be privately arranged or contracted for. For example, absent a legal (or civil) marriage, there is no guaranteed joint responsibility to the partner and to third parties (including children) in such areas as child support, debts to creditors, taxes, etc. In addition, private employers and institutions often give other economic privileges and other benefits (special rates or memberships) only to married couples. And, of course, when people cannot marry, they are denied all the emotional and social benefits and responsibilities of marriage as well.

I like that I’m able to help people understand that we’re just like them – as Keith says about some of the people I’ve complained about at work after finding out that they contribute HEAVILY to anti-gay groups, “You may be the only example of a happy, healthy, normal gay relationship that BLANK ever sees.  By knowing you BLANK may come to understand that maybe everything he/she has been lead to believe really is not true.”  Don’t get me wrong – those anti-gay folks are absolutely entitled to their opinions (otherwise I’d be as guilty of intolerance as some of them are apt to be) HOWEVER, their opinions should not lead them to attempt to legislate the rights of others.

It just boggles my mind that there are SO MANY sites run by ‘Christian’ people whose sole raison d’etre seems to be their preoccupation with homosexuals.  I mean, REALLY, I do not spend my every waking moment worrying about what my heterosexual neighbors may/may not be doing in bed or in their home – why is it that these folks (I refuse to give them the press by linking to their sites) have nothing better to do?  Imagine if all of that energy was put towards feeding the starving here in the US or providing shelter to the homeless or some other cause that is positive.  Oh well, to each their own I suppose. 

Let’s remember, we are a Republic, not a Democracy.  That means that the org chart for our country has everyone reporting to The Constitution – NOT THE PEOPLE.  Think about that.  Neither the president, the courts or even the legislature report to the people.  They report to the Constitution, and are duty bound to uphold the Constitutional Will, not the Peoples’ Will.  Watch this video if you need some basic training on the government of America. We are not a democracy, and never have been. We are a republic. We are a country of laws – and that includes the 14th Amendment.

Protect “Traditional” Marriage!

December 28, 2008 Leave a comment

Of Marriage and Federal/State Benefits.

November 13, 2008 Leave a comment

While California voters overtune equal rights (re: Prop 8), Connecticut same sex couples begin getting legally married.  Yay for the gay and lesbian couples in CT.  This is when I LOATHE living in the Bible belt.  I mean really, if it is not constitutional in New England, the North West, California – HOW exactly is it okay to ban same sex marriage in other states.  Something about reciprocity comes to my mind.  When heterosexual couples from other states, hell other countries come to the United States and/or Virginia….they do not have to get married again so that it is legal in this freaking state do they? Nope.

I don’t understand what the big deal is honestly.  I mean I get that the religious folks have their panties in a wad because they think it goes against God or that marriage is a religious institution but, I have said this before, and I am sure that I will at some point say it again.  Marriage was never originally about God, Religion, heck…it was almost never even about love.  It was a way of securing money, property, goods, or bloodlines to a ruling entity.  See marriage history.  Only later were religious overtones attached to the joining of two people.

I’ve been having somewhat of a difficult time at work dealing with my feelings regarding someone who is a known contributor (and I don’t mean they just give them $20 once a year either) of a certain action group that is VERY anti gay.  I respect people’s right to donate money to whomever they choose but, I have NEVER seen our annual charity drive allow groups that, for lack of better words, promote the hatred of another group of people.  I have previously been making strides to find out why such a group is even allowed to be part of our campaign and I suspect my next act will be a FOIA request annually to insure that they are meeting the requirements to remain on the list of “charities” not that anything about them seems charitable.

From their website:

Same-Sex “Marriage”

The battle for same-sex “marriage” does concern you

God ordained marriage to be between one man and one woman.  Unfortunately, some groups are now attempting to replace marriage with “anything goes” arrangements.  This disregard for marriage and its true purpose threatens to destroy this institution, to the detriment of future generations.  

Context
There is no more critical battle for our nation’s future.  The fight is fierce, and will become even more heated before it’s over.  ADF has been successful in defending marriage from these attacks in over a dozen states and will continue to be on the forefront to ensure that our children and grandchildren will grow up in a society that affirms marriage between one man and one woman.  

————————————————————————————

So, for the masses, marriage is now a religious issue.  Okay, but, there are also civil marriages that never take place in a church.  I also think people need to get that the Church does not marry people.  People marry People.  The ONLY thing the Church does is give its blessing of the union.  If marriage was STRICTLY a religious event then they could ONLY be performed in a house of worship (note I’m not saying church since there are other religions out there).  

One of the guys on Gaymer brought up a REALLY interesting point.  With this country being extremely big on the separation of Church and State, why are so many Federal and State benefits automatically conferred to people who – according to their own philosophy – are religiously joined in the institution of matrimony?  That made me think – HELL YEAH.  GOOD POINT!

I say strip EVERYONE of these Federal and State benefits and re-work the whole sha-bang.  Then let’s see if they still insist that we are exaggerating and that there are no special rights granted by marriage.  It amazes me that most married couples and single heterosexuals simply either don’t know or just take for granted all the FEDERAL and STATE benefits that are derived from marriage.

From the Religious Tolerance website:

On the order of 1,400 legal rights are conferred upon married couples in the U.S. Typically these are composed of about 400 state benefits and over 1,000 federal benefits. Among them are the rights to:

bullet joint parenting;
bullet joint adoption;
bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents);
bullet status as next-of-kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent;
bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health;
bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support;
bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries;
bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will;
bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment;
bullet inheritance of jointly-owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate);
bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare;
bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home;
bullet veterans’ discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns;
bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling;
bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children;
bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child;
bullet decision-making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her;
bullet crime victims’ recovery benefits;
bullet loss of consortium tort benefits;
bullet domestic violence protection orders;
bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity;
bullet and more….

Most of these legal and economic benefits cannot be privately arranged or contracted for. For example, absent a legal (or civil) marriage, there is no guaranteed joint responsibility to the partner and to third parties (including children) in such areas as child support, debts to creditors, taxes, etc. In addition, private employers and institutions often give other economic privileges and other benefits (special rates or memberships) only to married couples. And, of course, when people cannot marry, they are denied all the emotional and social benefits and responsibilities of marriage as well.

————————————————————————————————————————————

So, you see there are a number of benefits that come from marriage.  If marriage is something that SOME Americans do not want to share with OTHER Americans – okay fine BUT those people who take part in a RELIGIOUS ceremony/sacrament/thing/whatever you want to call it SHOULD NOT be conferred FEDERAL and STATE benefits now should they?

Interestingly enough these same zealots that cry about same-sex marriage ruining the institution of marriage are probably the same ones that want the Government OUT of their religion and life’s but are MORE THAN HAPPY to suck up the benefits when it works in their favor.  Which brings me to another thought.  What are these people defending marriage from?  The high rates of divorce?  The adultery that runs rampant?  The spousal abuse?  The children born from wedlock?  What?  I mean let’s face it, if marriage is screwed up, they cannot blame that on us (read as same sex couples) because we have not been allowed that privilege.  They have “owned” marriage for centuries so if it’s fucked up….it’s the straight peoples problem/fault – don’t go looking at us.

I now pronounce you – Husband & Husband?

July 23, 2008 Leave a comment

….I now pronounce you Partner & Partner?; or … how about, I now pronounce you legally wed? Bwhahaha yeah right, in Vah-juhn-yah. AIN’T.GONNA.HAPPEN!  So, Keith, my other half, decided he didn’t like being my ‘partner’ in the About Me section sooo I’m setting the record straight (pun intended).

Memorial Day week of 2006, I was officially married to this man:

Back Off!  He's Mine!

Back Off! He's Mine!

Now regrettably, we had to go to a different country for that to happen.  We had a nice ceremony in Canada; stayed in the Konica Minolta Toweroverlooking Niagara Falls; and had a really swell time!  I was actually shocked at how non-chalant the people were about the fact that two men were coming to get married.  I’ll never forget Keith’s comment, “Welcome to a civilized country.”  Everyone we met was so cool with it – the border guard, the waitstaff at Applebee’s and other restaurants, the nice lady at City Hall (where we got our license), EVERYONE was just so matter-of-fact about it.

Sadly, we’re not valid in this country….I know, I know – all those heterosexual couples from Canada, EU, South America, Asia, etc. ALL have to get re-married when they come to this country to live and/or work – ohhhh wait a tick – they don’t!  That’s riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. /sarcasm.

Well, the whole point of this post was just to let everyone know that Keith John Redden-McAllister is my LEGALLY (that’s right naysayers!) wed husband.

Now I’ll get a frantic call yelling at me for posting that picture but … guess what….IT’S STAYING THERE!

EDIT:  8/1/08 – Yes, he made me change the picture. LOL.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.